Home > Latest News > Goman v Stockport MBC


Goman v Stockport MBC




Probation officers and social workers did not owe a duty of care to warn a woman of her partner’s past history of domestic violence. HHJ Sephton QC so held in Goman v Stockport MBC, judgment 20 March 2018. The case is thought to have to been the first claim against social workers to have been tried following the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in CN v Poole. The Judge rejected an argument that the Supreme Court’s decision in Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police implicitly overruled CN v Poole; on the contrary the application of ordinary common law principles (as endorsed in Robinson) led to the conclusion that no duty of care was owed. The Judge further rejected a claim under the Human Rights Act 1998, holding that the high threshold for liability under that Act was not met. He also held that the Claimant and her daughter had not established that the giving of an earlier warning would have prevented the assaults in respect of which they sued.

Andrew Warnock QC, instructed by BLM, represented Stockport MBC

Latest Stop Press Read more


Acceptance of Part 36 offers – what happens if the offer made was a mistake?

18th January 2019

Cases discussing Part 36 offers usually concern whether they were accepted after expiry of the relevant period, their withdrawal and the costs associated with their acceptance or rejection. But what happens if a party makes a Part 36 offer which they allege is a mistake, and that offer is...

Read more

Civil Liability Act 2018 receives Royal Assent on 20th December 2018

9th January 2019

The news that the Civil Liability Act 2018 received Royal Assent on 20th December 2018 may have passed many by due to the Christmas Holiday period. Now that it is an Act of Parliament it is perhaps sensible to look more carefully at the terms of the Act to assess what areas may give rise to...

Read more