Home > Latest News > Goman v Stockport MBC


Goman v Stockport MBC




Probation officers and social workers did not owe a duty of care to warn a woman of her partner’s past history of domestic violence. HHJ Sephton QC so held in Goman v Stockport MBC, judgment 20 March 2018. The case is thought to have to been the first claim against social workers to have been tried following the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in CN v Poole. The Judge rejected an argument that the Supreme Court’s decision in Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police implicitly overruled CN v Poole; on the contrary the application of ordinary common law principles (as endorsed in Robinson) led to the conclusion that no duty of care was owed. The Judge further rejected a claim under the Human Rights Act 1998, holding that the high threshold for liability under that Act was not met. He also held that the Claimant and her daughter had not established that the giving of an earlier warning would have prevented the assaults in respect of which they sued.

Andrew Warnock QC, instructed by BLM, represented Stockport MBC

Latest Stop Press Read more


Supreme Court: CN & GN v Poole Borough Council

16th July 2018

Today (16th July 2018) The Supreme Court will begin hearing the appeal in CN & GN v Poole Borough Council. This is scheduled for one and a half days.

The defendant is represented by Edward Faulks QC, Paul Stagg and Katie Ayres, instructed by Rob Hams of...

Read more

Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v S Williams & R Waistell

4th July 2018

The Court of Appeal has confirmed that damages are recoverable in nuisance for the encroachment of Japanese Knotweed on the neighbouring land.  Nicola Atkins acted as a junior counsel (led by Stephen Tromans QC) for the Second Respondent homeowner in an appeal brought by Network Rail.

You...

Read more