Home > Latest News > Jenkins v Chief Constable of Essex Police – finding of gross exaggeration


Jenkins v Chief Constable of Essex Police – finding of gross exaggeration




Laura Johnson has successfully represented the defendant police force in a claim for in excess of £750,000 arising out of a knee injury sustained by a police officer who fell off her desk at work.  The background to the fall was a prank by a fellow officer who had hidden the Claimant’s mobile telephone in the ceiling void.  The Claimant alleged that she had suffered a career ending injury and sought significant damages including for loss of earnings and pension and for an automatic car for life.  HHJ Freeland QC found that the defendant was vicariously liable for the officer who had hidden the phone, but concluded that the Claimant had grossly exaggerated her injury.  He found that the Claimant had suffered an injury that had largely recovered within 18 to 24 months of the accident.  Although she was restricted in her ability to carry out potentially confrontational duties she was fit for all other work and could have continued to have a fulfilling career with the police had she not chosen to present herself as unfit for work.  She was awarded damages of just over £10,000, failing to beat a Part 36 offer made in April 2016.  As such she has been ordered to pay all of the Defendant’s costs from the last date for acceptance of the offer. 

Laura Johnson was instructed by Clyde & Co LLP on behalf of the Chief Constable of Essex Police

For press coverage:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-43155309

 

 

Latest Stop Press Read more


The ‘Illegality’ Defence rears its ugly head again.

18th September 2018

Maurice Rifat comments on his success in the recently handed down decision of the Court of Appeal.

In the Judgment in Stoffel v Grondona [2018] EWCA CIV 2031 handed down on 13th September 2018, the Court of Appeal held that a solicitors’ firm was liable in negligence in failing to register...

Read more

QOCS UPDATE - Three recent wins for defendants

18th September 2018

Jeffrey Cartwright v Venduct Engineering Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1654

The proper interpretation of CPR 44.14 with regard to: i) multi-defendant cases; and ii) Tomlin orders.

 

44.14

This provision permits a defendant in personal injury proceedings (which are governed by the QOCS regime) with a...

Read more