Home > Latest News > Kasikci v London Borough of Southwark & Others

Kasikci v London Borough of Southwark & Others

Ella Davis has successfully represented the London Borough of Southwark in a claim alleging that it had breached a duty to place a homeless applicant in suitable temporary accommodation. 

The Claimant applied to the London Borough of Southwark (“the First Defendant") for temporary accommodation. The First Defendant discharged its statutory duty by spot purchasing a room in a bed and breakfast owned and managed by the Second and Third Defendant. The room was on the top floor of the property. On his fourth day in the property the Claimant fell down the stairs, allegedly sustaining injury. His case was that his fall was due to a combination of a loose carpet, a lack of handrails, and an asthma attack which caused him to faint. The Claimant alleged that the property was in disrepair and further that the First Defendant, in view of the medical information he had disclosed, should have found him accommodation in a ground floor room.

The claim was dismissed against all three defendants. The judge did not accept that the property was in disrepair. Further, she accepted submissions made on behalf of the First Defendant that it did not owe the Claimant an actionable duty of care. Any breach of the First Defendant’s statutory duty could not give rise to a private law remedy in damages (O’Rourke v Camden [1998] AC 188). Further, no duty arose at common law. The allegations were properly characterised as omissions rather than positive acts. In any event, the act of offering the temporary accommodation was the very statutory function against which no private right of action can arise. In addition, given the judge’s findings that the property was not in disrepair and that the Claimant had not disclosed a history of black outs and fainting, there was no foreseeable risk of injury of the type sustained. Finally, this was a not a new duty case because the very issue which the claim raised had been determined against the claimant in the case of Darby v Richmond Borough Council [2015] EWHC 909.

Ella was instructed by Browne Jacobson LLP

Latest Stop Press Read more

Experts in contempt - amend reports at your peril...

21st March 2019

Medical reports are often meticulously scrutinised in personal injury claims. They provide an overview of the claimant's personal account to his or her expert of their symptomatology, past medical history and the circumstances of their accident. Sometimes, a claimant may suggest that...

Read more

Channel 4 Television v Met Police Commissioner [2019] 1 WLUK 322

19th March 2019

A very sensible ruling by Edis J that the Crown Court has no jurisdiction to make any order for costs in relation to an application for a production order under the Terrorism Act 2000.

The case arose from the screening of a documentary by Channel 4 which showed a UK national, one Matthews,...

Read more